When most people think of revolt or revolution they think marching, relocating or a rally to arms. I don't think this kind of revolution would be practical for America anymore. Where would we march to? Where would we relocate? What would we attack if mounted a sizable force?
What we need is an information retaliation. Liberals have put all their efforts into packaging the rhetoric of men to make it palatable- concealing the results of implementing such practices and then criticizing their opponents into silence. Pretty effective as they now control virtually all American universities, the majority of courts, and all three executive branches.
What would have happened if they spelled out their whole agenda and intentions from the start and presented it to the American public for validation: Ensure freedom to voluntarily surgically terminate pregnancies, minimize expansion of habitable land by strict regulation and conversion to federal wild land, secure left-wing power by indoctrinating youth as early as possible, limit parental influence, demonize Christianity, reduce sentences of volatile convicts, implement socialism via labor unions, and ensure private citizens can no longer own weapons?
As unpopular as Republicans are, what kind of success would they have had in pushing agenda items like these? The reality is, if you ask your typical teenage where the majority of these ideas come from they'd say respond vehemently, "Republicans!"
How do we respond? With TV and radio air time, facebook / myspace, magazine advertisements, passive boycotts, public service announcements, law suits... In short, every means conceivable. Try a TV commercial that rallies a class action law suit against public schools or universities with dialog as such: Do you feel ashamed to speak up in class because your teacher or professor belittles your beliefs? Feel like your history class is a lecture against America? Are you afraid that your grades will be compromised if you voice your honest opinion on your assignments?... Then you have a web page or toll free number to call. Would you get students calling in in droves for representation? Probably not, but it would put the message in kids minds that maybe their public school has an agenda and perhaps give a sense of accountability to left-wing instructors. Can liberals then say we're stealing funding from education? If they like, but this can be money going to parents to have some choice in where their kids go.
In newspaper ads we have statistics- who receives money from where, what is hidden in liberal authored bills, what are the ACLU, teacher and labor unions, and environmentalist lobbies imposing on America, where are they getting their money and who in congress keeps receiving it? We tie-in activist judges with who appointed them. If they were voted in, are the people getting what they voted for? What is the impact of good-intentioned liberal policy such as minimum wage increase, banning firearms, public housing and welfare? There are measurable detrimental consequences.
Normally boycotts are designed to get companies to change. Not in this case. We're depriving them of profit, with or without notice. We're going to target those who are financing special interests. We're going to encourage conservatives to apply for work elsewhere.
The liberals have been having a field day using their various organizations to implement policy via law-suit. Putting reckless environmental policy in place that endangers humans, censoring historic monuments, imposing modified history on schools and banning holiday recognition if it's not within the confines of their secular view. To these organizations we coordinate mass preemptive law-suits. We start with the most pressing matters such as policy imposed on private property. As opposed to the public school suits, these will be for substantial amounts of money. Of which will immediately be re-allocated to the defeat of the left-wing activist organizations.
What are we going to do when we're called hate-mongers, religious zealots, right-wing extremists?- How do we respond when we're accused of practicing "politics of personal destruction," fear-mongering, "partisan politics?" The answer is what would the American colonists have done if pre-revolution England had used criticism as its primary attack method?
Drawing the line in the sand is our first imperative. If anyone devotes themselves to teaching children that American parents indoctrinate their children with hate (not their parents, just everyone else's parents,) that America is bias in its judgments because of religious influence, and our success (and anyone who is successful) has come at the expense of everyone else- then they are our enemy. Not "unpatriotic," but in direct opposition to America, if not the principles of the teachings of Jesus Christ which this nation is founded upon.