When most people think of revolt or revolution they think marching, relocating or a rally to arms. I don't think this kind of revolution would be practical for America anymore. Where would we march to? Where would we relocate? What would we attack if mounted a sizable force?
What we need is an information retaliation. Liberals have put all their efforts into packaging the rhetoric of men to make it palatable- concealing the results of implementing such practices and then criticizing their opponents into silence. Pretty effective as they now control virtually all American universities, the majority of courts, and all three executive branches.
What would have happened if they spelled out their whole agenda and intentions from the start and presented it to the American public for validation: Ensure freedom to voluntarily surgically terminate pregnancies, minimize expansion of habitable land by strict regulation and conversion to federal wild land, secure left-wing power by indoctrinating youth as early as possible, limit parental influence, demonize Christianity, reduce sentences of volatile convicts, implement socialism via labor unions, and ensure private citizens can no longer own weapons?
As unpopular as Republicans are, what kind of success would they have had in pushing agenda items like these? The reality is, if you ask your typical teenage where the majority of these ideas come from they'd say respond vehemently, "Republicans!"
How do we respond? With TV and radio air time, facebook / myspace, magazine advertisements, passive boycotts, public service announcements, law suits... In short, every means conceivable. Try a TV commercial that rallies a class action law suit against public schools or universities with dialog as such: Do you feel ashamed to speak up in class because your teacher or professor belittles your beliefs? Feel like your history class is a lecture against America? Are you afraid that your grades will be compromised if you voice your honest opinion on your assignments?... Then you have a web page or toll free number to call. Would you get students calling in in droves for representation? Probably not, but it would put the message in kids minds that maybe their public school has an agenda and perhaps give a sense of accountability to left-wing instructors. Can liberals then say we're stealing funding from education? If they like, but this can be money going to parents to have some choice in where their kids go.
In newspaper ads we have statistics- who receives money from where, what is hidden in liberal authored bills, what are the ACLU, teacher and labor unions, and environmentalist lobbies imposing on America, where are they getting their money and who in congress keeps receiving it? We tie-in activist judges with who appointed them. If they were voted in, are the people getting what they voted for? What is the impact of good-intentioned liberal policy such as minimum wage increase, banning firearms, public housing and welfare? There are measurable detrimental consequences.
Normally boycotts are designed to get companies to change. Not in this case. We're depriving them of profit, with or without notice. We're going to target those who are financing special interests. We're going to encourage conservatives to apply for work elsewhere.
The liberals have been having a field day using their various organizations to implement policy via law-suit. Putting reckless environmental policy in place that endangers humans, censoring historic monuments, imposing modified history on schools and banning holiday recognition if it's not within the confines of their secular view. To these organizations we coordinate mass preemptive law-suits. We start with the most pressing matters such as policy imposed on private property. As opposed to the public school suits, these will be for substantial amounts of money. Of which will immediately be re-allocated to the defeat of the left-wing activist organizations.
What are we going to do when we're called hate-mongers, religious zealots, right-wing extremists?- How do we respond when we're accused of practicing "politics of personal destruction," fear-mongering, "partisan politics?" The answer is what would the American colonists have done if pre-revolution England had used criticism as its primary attack method?
Drawing the line in the sand is our first imperative. If anyone devotes themselves to teaching children that American parents indoctrinate their children with hate (not their parents, just everyone else's parents,) that America is bias in its judgments because of religious influence, and our success (and anyone who is successful) has come at the expense of everyone else- then they are our enemy. Not "unpatriotic," but in direct opposition to America, if not the principles of the teachings of Jesus Christ which this nation is founded upon.

Last night I watched Rep. Boehner speak in respect to the new administration. I was very disappointed to hear him speak of reaching across party lines with the new administration as the new administration does the same. The expression fool me once shame on you, fool me twice shame on me, comes to mind. Rep. Boehner, are these not Democrats? Do Democrats ever demonstrate a spirit of bipartisanship? Let us recall their onslaught on Newt Gengrich, any conservative judicial nominee, including Clarence Thomas, John Roberts, and Samuel Alito.They have ridiculous predjudices they indulge in, such as a conservative individual might have, "strongly held religious beliefs that might impare their judgement." The notion of strongly held beliefs apparently doesn't have any application to Democrats' criteria for candidate qualifications as their is no accountability for destructive policies, low caliber of character, or adherance to the constitution.

Have you ever wondered what a liberal has in mind when they bear the banner "Save Darfur?" To be as concise as possible, this implies an intervention to stop atrocities of warlords. So what intervention do they have in mind? A protest? Diplomacy? I haven't any disposition to make light of a legitimate abomination that gives good light to why we keep the term "evil" around. What's a liberal to do? Absolutely nothing. They can't. They will not. The UN has all the power it needs to assert force with support from the US. Why don't they? Because it creates a standard of righteousness which equates to self-righteousness and hypocrisy in popular world opinion. Also, because the best solution is militias. Militias are inherently associated with rage and mobs and guns because of rhetoric of fools. And when weapons are distributed to a population, a tyrant will rise up out of the population and persecute with the 9mm he's been issued. It's a dysfunctional self-defeating screenplay. I say, give the poor people weapons. Arm them, and allow them to defend their wives and their children, their parents, their friends. If they decide to abuse the bearing of arms, let it be on them. By omitting such an empowerment as a civilization, we've exercised a judgment on them and given the tyrants who've already offended a free pass.

 

1. Stop trying to "keep up" with or placate the Democrats. We've spent far too long apologizing for the the image they've concocted of us and basing our actions off the fallacious depictions they make of us.

2. We need to recognize that the network news, the AP, and CNN are agenda driven. The only way to demonstrate their partisan nature is to not entertain questions unless quotes are given in entirety. They also need to be held accountable as their power is protected by the constitution.

3. Democrats very conveniently tout their politics under the guise of virtue: Clean environment, healthy children, equal rights, quality education... Rubbish! We need to brake down the constituents who the Democrats serve, define what they stand for, and call each and everyone to task for selling out.

4. We need to stop using "Liberal" as a euphemism for Democrat. Joe Lieberman's quality of character should make the contrast that much more stark that Democrat representation is rotten to the  core rather than giving them a pass.

5. Global warming is the latest manifestation of pop-science. In previous generations liberals were plagued by disposable diapers buried 100 yards underground. What if we took a proactive approach and measured the results? I propose private level nuclear powered ionic atmosphere cleaners placed in the country's dirtiest cities. We pull carcinogens, carbon, and irritants out of the air and do so without any of the self-righteousness.

6. Democrats have been using industry as one of their scape goats for how long? The industrial revolution is one of the crowning, epitomizing periods of the spirit of America. With the Democrats throwing out accusations at corporations and business we still have legitimate companies consistently donating to the Democrat party. What happens if we coordinate a cessation of said funding? What percent of the DNC war chest comes from otherwise good conservative companies?

7. Education has become convoluted and politicized. The best recourse is to gurd up charter schools. On public and private levels we need to fortify charter schools in states where they are already permitted, utilize conservative publishers for history text books, and have prayer if for no other reason than just to say to the liberals, "you suck."

8. We don't have to have a congress composed of Newt Gengrichs, but let's get away from politicians and start recruiting retired executives, authors, publishers, prior military service, and heck, people who have a lot of contacts in private industry. Let them cry favoritism. If we focus on the task at hand the results will be a lot louder.

9. I think we should break down the primary amendments of the constitution and outline  plans around them. Freedom of the press: How has it been compromised- how do we redeem it? Right to bear arms? Do we begin a PR campaign?

10. Last in a list of ten: (As Matt Lewis alluded) Counter-cyber terrorism. We killed the Taliban primarily be relinquishing their funds. We out spent the USSR in the cold war. Now we have any number of foreign entities constantly trying to steal identities, crash systems, and swindle funds. I say we work towards tactical software-based strikes against identified cyber-terrorists.

  Some nations have been left vulnerable to demise by being spread to thin, some because arrogance or hedonism; and others, who cares... Let's talk about ours. If on the state level we behaved like our nation does in respect to other countries we'd be conducting polls in Illinois of what they think of policy in Colorado and adapt accordingly. Lost is the notion of forming legislation based on principle and the constitution. What takes higher precedence is, put simply: politics. Not the politics of Republican vs. Democrat, but the office politics: of I'm trying to appear smarter than the guy at cubicle 13A because he had a better presentation right before mine and made me feel dumb. What are the tools? I criticize and accuse until you buckle. I take a jab at you and if you fight back you're being mean... (err, I meant mean-spirited.) My favorite is speaking authoritatively and pursuing such stations until you believe you are: Feigned objectivity, vicarious self-deprecation, and citing unsubstantiated research claims are the order of the day. So let's stop apologizing, stop compromising, stop working solely on appearances, and resume attending to the interests of what's right, rather than what's publicly pleasing.